On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 11:03 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: > So I guess I sort of agree with Shane, but not when it comes to response > goals for CICS and DDF.
In case anyone got the (wrong) impression I was debunking r/t goals - especially for things like Mark mentioned, I wasn't. I thought they were a *great* addition - note however they were an addition to WLM. In fact I"neglected" to change to goal mode until this change shipped. However it ain't the "be all and end all" - if you share service classes across disproportionate CECs, watch the consumption numbers on the little fella. *Especially* if you tighten the goals in light of the new processor. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
