Hi David,

Thanks!  The OPT(4) is something I should have remembered but it was
pretty late.   I did consider PARALLEL but it's not "automagical" and I
didn't want to build JCL and control statements customized to one dump
by hand.  I think you are right that if I had used FDR/DSF there would
have been some concurrent activity without special setup and something I
may consider in the future.  I was hoping there was a way to get DFDSS
to do more concurrent activity without specifying multiple tasks
manually. 


        Thanks, 

                Sam Knutson, GEICO 
                Performance and Availability Management 
                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
                (office)  301.986.3574 



If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith.
Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DFSMSdss Performance Question

Sam,
  Yes there is a Parallel command see the DSS Admin Reference
4.2.2  PARALLEL Command                       C Copyright IBM Corp.
1984, 200
                                                     Topic lines 1 to 16
of 2
<SNIP>

The example shown is for full volume dumps. You probably could have
rigged something for your logical dump but I have to admit it would be
easier to do using FDR.

Regards,
Dave O'Brien 
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to