We're not talking about a 'system parm' so I don't see how Health Checker applies.
As to "'check my parms' options", I believe the assumption is that we know what we are doing and have read the manual. If we take responsibility for our actions, then we shouldn't expect IBM or any vendor to autotune our jobs. Having said that I notice FDR takes the opposite approach and defaults to BUFNO=max. But again it's up to the submitter to know that and throttle back, if his environment dictates it. Again, just my opinion. -----Original Message----- From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DFSMSdss Performance Question In a message dated 6/13/2006 9:32:53 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: bus and tag cabling, a hit might have been noticeable and people who I respect have told me not to use OPT(4). With the newer technology, I think OPT(4) ought to be SOP. Just my opinion. >> What if was part of Health Checker? Or for that matter 'Check my parms' options. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
