Yeah, you're missing the first few posts of the thread <g>. Pretty much all of that has been covered.
- I have partial evidence, but the evidence I have is that only about 600 records were written. That would fill well within the specified allocation, assuming it happened as specified. - IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,jobname,stepname,SYSUT7,5572,TEMP01,SYS06167.T102753.RA000.j obname.R0227249 Not the most informative message, IMHO. - The original question was about track capacity because I was trying to figure out how many records would fit in the specified allocation. I moved on to "did the allocation happen the way I think it did?" Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerhard Adam Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 4:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Track capacity? Maybe I'm missing something here, but what does track capacity have to do with this? This is a problem that can clearly happen well within the allocation specifications by running out of extents, not having enough volumes available, or even filling up the VTOC. Any chance you have the text of the IEC030I message that goes with this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
