That doesn't look right, but please consider my bad memory. But wasn't the track capacity for a 3380 - 47476???
James F. Smith Bayshore Consulting Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +86 10 6439 1733 fax +86 10 8046 2133 Skype jamesfs1 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne & Lynn Wheeler Sent: 17 June 2006 02:49 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Track capacity? Charles Mills wrote: > "all disks since dinosaurs roamed the Earth." Heck, it's got the 2311 and > 2305. (That should be enough start up another one of those darned mainframe > nostalgia threads.) i've done q&d conversion of the old gcard ios3270 to html. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/gcard.html it has record size calculations ... but it predated 3390 ... so only has up thru 3380 http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/gcard.html#26.3 from above Track Record Size Device Capacity Without key With key 3375 36000 224+#(D+191) 224+#(K+191)+#(D+191) 3380 47968 480+#(D+12) 704+#(K+12)+#(D+12) Device Capacity Without key With key Notes: D is data length, K is key length # means round up to multiple of 32 3390 track capacity is listed as 56,664 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
