That may explain our different experience. I had mine set to the maximum available at that time, probably 16, but not positive. AND I had no requirement for applyincremental.
Bob Richards -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: manual incremental backups Bob, I'm pretty sure I was using DFDSS as the data mover. The problem was only 1 volume restored at a time when I expected 15 subtasks to be active. Dave O'Brien -----Original Message----- From: Richards.Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: manual incremental backups Dave, What were you using as your data mover back then? I believe I restored AUTODUMP'ed volumes as fast as DFSMSdss dumps when using DSS as the data mover. Bob Richards LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Seeing Beyond Money is a service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. [ST:XCL] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
