> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
>
> > "This used to work."
>
> The usual question is "ok, if it was working before then what
> changed?"
z/OS 1.5 preventive maintenance RSU0604, plus HIPERs and PEFIXes, were
applied. Previous level was RSU0511.
> Do you see any other messages in the log?
None.
> > However, program D00YAAI exists, lives in a library that is both
> > APF-authorized and concatenated in the //ISPLLIB concatenation, and
> has
> > AC=1. I can browse the load module, so I know it's there.
>
> Editorial comment, "it should not be AC=1".
Vendor supplies it with AC=1.
> It just needs to
> be in an authorized library. The presence of ANY unauthorized
> library in a given concatenation renders that entire
> concatenation unauthorized. I would look there first.
There are unauthorized libraries in the //ISPLLIB concatenation. But if
it's an authorization issue, why does the reason code translate to
"program not found" (reason code 40 (x'28')) instead of something like
"program not authorized" (reason code 56 (x'38'))?
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
