Hal, DS8100 is significantly faster than ESS800, but channels are the same.
Marian Gasparovic IBM Slovakia On 7/27/06, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are on a countdown to move from a 2105-800 Shark to a 2107-921 DS8100. The motor is a z/890 2066-0A4. We are a 7x24 online shop with some tight SLA's. All of our slack for years was consumed by a generator failure. We have four FICON paths to the Shark and two to the DS8100. The thought is to swing one of the FICONs to the DS8100 making three each for the transition. The transition will be 'hot' using IBM services and the FDR product. Question: are the channels faster in the DS8100? Should we stay with the 4-2 split until after the migration is complete? Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks all. NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
