In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/28/2006
   at 10:42 AM, "Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Is is my understanding and experience that the initiator will ENQ on
>all data sets referenced in the JCL (all steps) at job initiation
>time. The job will not start even the first step before all ENQs 
>have been granted. So a job might be "WAITING FOR DATASETS" even  if
>the one not yet available is only referenced in step nn (nn > 1).

>At step end, the initiator will DEQ any DSNs that are no longer
>needed, i.e. those which are not referenced on a DD in any later
>step.

>It is also my understanding that this is initiator business and
>therefore works the same way in either JES2 or JES3 environments. (I
>don't talk about main device secheduling in JES3, which only  handles
>devices, not DSN ENQs).

Correct.

>My colleague claimes that he once was told by an ISV that in a JES2
>environment two jobs can be serialized on a certain step by  coding
>a DISP=OLD/MOD DD for a data set in the step to be seriallzed.

It is certainly plausible that an ISV would have a representative who
was not didn't understand how MVS works but also didn't understand
that he didn't understand.

>The jobs would then execute in parallel until they come to that 
>specific step. They also said that this will not work in a JES3
>environment because JES3 behaves as I described above. This
>contradicts my understanding (and experience).

You've never experienced an ISV that misinformed its customers, or a
colleague that misquoted an ISV?

>Can anybody enlighten me if this has changed in either JES2 or 
>JES3, and if so when this change happended.

The ISV is either wrong or misquoted.

>I seem to remember as far back as MVS/XA that the job-level-ENQ 
>behaviour is how  it works. Am I wrong?

No, and the behavior goes back, unchanged, to OS/360.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to