In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/30/2006
at 09:44 AM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Part of the problem with this type of incorrect "conflict" is that
>the SYSDSN Queue (the QNAME used for the ENQ/DEQ) regards the DSN
>(the RNAME) as the identifier of the Dataset not the CORRECT DSN with
> VOLSER.
Which volser? You would have to be very careful to avoid a deadly
embrace.
>This goes back to the OS360 (PCP/MFT/MVT) days when the concept of
>having two CPUs sharing their ENQ/DEQ Queue was not imagined.
OS/360 supported shared DASD. OS/360 had an MP option and ASP
supported loosely coupled processors.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
