In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/01/2006
at 06:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>View this from the perspective of the initiator: RET=CHNG is
>available, yet the initiator never exploits it -- it can't by design
>objective.
You're overlooking DYNALLOC.
>Likewise, if RET=CHNG were not available, you could equally well
>simply DEQ and re-ENQ with EXCL scope.
That wouldn't have the same effect and would be, in general,
disastrous.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
