In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/27/2006
at 05:17 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Likewise, if an edit session is interrupted with RECOVERY ON, does
>ISPF lock out other editing of the same member until the original
>user recovers?
No.
>As others have noted here, CMS UPDATE provides mechanisms for
>managing delta libraries far more sophisticated than IEBUPDTE. I
>exploited them; they were useful, but not sufficient to make me
>prefer CMS nowadays to z/OS.
While I don't prefer CMS to TSO, I *do* prefer XEDIT to TSO EDIT and
miss it even when using ISPF/PDF EDIT. I wonder how hard it would be
to port THE to TSO?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
