On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:56:36 -0400, Wayne Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And I would counter that the best way to get a requirement reject by IBM >is to tell them how it should be implemented. The requirement should >spell out the PROBLEM in detail, not HOW the user thinks it should be >... It depends. Requirements submitted through SHARE have an optional field where a solution can be proposed. IBM does not have to pay any attention to the proposed solution, but if the author describes the solution he/she needs rather than details of the implementation, this can help IBM. A solution that solves the problem but doen't address the need is no solution at all to the submitter of the Requirement. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
