In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
08/28/2006
at 09:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>And I would counter that the best way to get a requirement reject by
>IBM is to tell them how it should be implemented.
There is a difference between suggesting implementations and telling
IBM how to implement. I've seen requirements rejected due to *not*
suggesting a solution. The Devil is in the details; you need to have a
good problem statement and you need to be clear that the suggestions
are only suggestions.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html