In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/28/2006
at 11:20 AM, David Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>However, when our need is immediate, we code an immediate workaround
>and then move on. That's also just a reality.
One of the things that I have always done when I installed a new
release was to look for workarounds that were no longer necessary. If
you leave them in place, they will eventually come back to haunt you;
that's *also* part of reality.
>Just exercising your "rights"? Or did you actually have a strong
>reason (I mean other than convenience) for rolling back a release
>related flag name into an older z/OS release where it should not
>have existed.
Do you know for a fact that they did so? It seems more plausible that
it *should* have existed, for reasons that you haven't taken into
account, e.g., toleration service.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
