We've always considered SNA to be the most reliable and secure networking system created. But that was in the days of leased lines, and modems connected directly to the circuits and the FEPs.
With everything running through devices which can be accessed through the network, SNA (and everything else) is now vulnerable as was pointed out. The article (and the presenter (presumably)) centered on SNA, but I'm sure any protocol (or data traffic) is vulnerable using his methods. On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:31:31 -0700, Ray Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Interesting article on the SearchDataCenter site today... > >http://tinyurl.com/juuee > >Could SNA be cracked? (Note the proper word use here. Hackers do not do >bad. Crackers do bad.) > >Later, >Ray > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
