I once installed a product called TASA from INFOSECINC.
The package is downloadable from the company's web site
as a binary file. It then is TSO RECEIVED into a
samplib. The supplied install
jobs do all the SMPE stuff.
Seems the best of both worlds.........
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Non-SMP/e packaging
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
> A perfect example is Innovation's FDR. I have used it
in virtually
I have never heard complaints about FDR support, etc.
Is seems that SMP/E is not crucial to it.
People discuss about *binary* alternatives: SMP/E or
library unload.
I think there are other ways to manage the code. Even
SMP/E could be
simpler. Current conceptions are for historical
reasons, not because of
real needs. Compromise between history and usability
makes SMP/E
difficult to understand and then cumbersome.
Why don't we think about "SMP2" - new approach, totally
free of old junk.
My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
-------------------------------------------------------
---------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
