On Sep 15, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Schwarz, Barry A wrote:

I don't know what date the Sterling acquisition refers to but in the
past couple of years I was still receiving maintenance in ZAP format for
CA-1 5.2 (before it went out of support).  Thankfully it was a very
small number of SYSMODs.
---------------------SNIP_________________

A long time ago I supported syncsort. Approximately every week I got at least one zap (vers and reps) along with instructions to use PARM="IGNIDRDATA".

I was always careful coding the reps up. But once in a while I would make the proverbial keystroke error. I ignbore their instructions to use the parm and when the module ran out of IDR space I would relink the module and rerun the zaps.

These zaps were at times a page in length so it was "easy" to make a keystroke error.

I got into the mode of copying the module to a private library and running the zap against the private library. During our mintenance window I would then copy the library into production.

It was not easy to test the zaps because you were never quite sure the testing tested out what was zapped. I suppose I could have zapped in an 0C1 but it never seemed like it was a for sure thing to do. Synsort TS was really good back then (I don't know currently) so it was never really a crap shoot but worrisome nun-the-less.

When it came time to decide whether to go back to DFSORT that was the tipping (the zaps) decider.

Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to