You still could be fine. But, what the heck, if it were me, I'd probably just put up another volume the way I wanted it to be and move all datasets off the one with the small VVDS (and re-init the first volume). Yes, I can be anal at times. <grin> I suppose an ounce of problem prevention is easier than a pound of problem resolution.
Bob Richards -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 11:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CATALOG ERROR - Defining VVDS Bad news it is. It is a 3390-9. "Richards.Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not sure I know the answer to that, but unless this volume is larger than a 3390-3, you are probably fine. Bob Richards Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Seeing Beyond Money is a service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. [ST:XCL] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
