Ted MacNEIL wrote:
anyone got any ideas on how to ensure it
does not happen again.
Public flogging?
Execution?
Hire new operators?
Well, I'd suggest something more humanitarian.
...no, not poison injection <g>
I would ask:
WHY the h.ll they do VARY ... OFFLINE ?
probably because it is needed (is it ???)
Probably it is a part of repetitive procedure, not ad hoc action.
Probably the addresses are not changed frequently.
SO, let them start IEFBR14 procedure with proper COMMAND statement.
// V xxxx-yyyy,OFFLINE
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
the above is much less error prone.
Of course it is not a solution for "random requests", but let's be
honest: who is the requestor, why the requestor don't do it himself ?
My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
