In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 09/20/2006
at 10:16 PM, Jim Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As to why subpool 0 is shared, I haven't been able to think of a
>reason. I don't know of anything that the initiator obtains in
>subpool 0 that the jobstep task can free (unless there was a time
>when programs would free the the EXEC PARM= parameter storage after
>processing it),
There was. That might still be the case; I haven't checked in decades.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
