In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 09/25/2006
at 09:32 AM, "Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I don't tell theories, but reallity.
Untue.
>I don't tell theories, but reallity. Did you try it?
Yes. Now, the code may have changed since then, but your "Come on,
think" implied a logical necessity, not something that might vary from
version to version. A test against obsolete code is sufficient to
demonstrate the falsity of that argument.
>No theory,
It's a theory that it had to be that way.
>all rereadable in docs.
Those will only tell, at best, how it is currently coded. Youi implied
more than that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
