On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Thanks. I can do almost anything but this will require some re-thinking.
:>In the INCLUDE is SET and DD statements used by the job.
:>> Can you place it in-line?
:>Are you implying that the basic job file is completely read before the TSO
:>SUBMIT command returns to the issuer? In other words, that the following
:>sequence would be safe?
:>"SUB X.CNTL(ABC)"
:>Allocate, modify, and free X.CNTL(ABC)
:>"SUB X.CNTL(ABC)"
Yes.
SUBMIT simply copies it to SYSOUT(INTRDR)
You could equally put it into the REXX stack and then do a
SUBMIT *
:>-----Original Message-----
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
:>Of Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 12:13 PM
:>To: [email protected]
:>Subject: Re: Collisions between converter(?) and TSO?
:>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:16:49 -0700 Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>:>2. Is there any way to interlock that other than adding a small delay and
:>:>hoping for the best? The EXEC only has to run in my sandbox, not at a
:>:>customer site. The EXEC currently does the modify of the INCLUDE member by
:>:>ALLOC OLD
:>:>Write with EXECIO
:>:>FREE
:>What is in the INCLUDE?
:>Can you place it in-line?
:>Can you create different members?
--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
