On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:37:10 -0400, Arthur T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also take REFR as a hint that the code can go into >the LPALIB concatenation. It's my understanding that those >modules are paged-in via CLPA and never paged out. ... ITYM loaded and paged out at CLPA time, then never paged out again. > > (I once tried a PMR or Share requirement (I forget >which) that all of IBM's LPA-eligible modules be linked >REFR, along with error messages for any non-REFR modules >loaded via CLPA. It got shot down because the modules are >owned by too many different groups. I guess the idea that >all of those groups are owned by IBM, who *should* have the >last say in QA, was too subtle.) And moot, now that they have redefined RENT to say that "A reenterable module cannot modify its own code." I don't see that there's a distinction between that and REFR any more. Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
