Matthew Thanks for letting us all know that something now works.
However, there are two types of route, those to the Ethernet LAN and those to the Hipersockets links. Which of these supports your FTP work? Have you performed any testing using the other? Did you include the "/32" entries that I suggested may have been added dynamically and hence do not need to be among the defined ROUTE statements? Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Stitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> Sent: Friday, 27 October, 2006 9:31 PM Subject: Re: I love TCPIP (not!) Hi Chris; I think we've finally gotten a set of ROUTES definitions that are working. I performed an FTP to the server after settting these up according to your examples, and it worked. I'll keep monitoring things for a while. Thanks for your assistance and patience on this issue. Hopefully some others on this list learned a few things. I know I did. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
