Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:39:58 +0000, john gilmore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
recommendation and your own CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) value, I would
change
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767)
which may be an old typo, to
RECORDSIZE(26624,32767)
Not a typo today, but I'm not enough of a VSAM expert to say if there
is any real reason why the avg recordsize is less than the CISIZE
specification.
CIDF+2RDFs ?
AFAIR CIDF is 4 bytes, RDFs are 3B each. Sum is 10 bytes.
BTW: This is SPANNED file. For non-spanned clusters obviously it's
common to have avg recordsize less than CISZ. For SPANNED it's not so
obvious, but still avg can be a value outside of set of allowable CI sizes.
My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
