Could someone say what is going on with this in people friendly language? (-:
I read the PSI filing but I didn't understand it. I have to admit I'm totally confused. One reason was I got PSI mixed up with FSI. Fundamental makes an emulator, right called Flex? And only their systems are allowed to run ADCD and licensed IBM software? And they only sell through resellers, Cornerstone CSI being one of them? So who is PSI? I went to their website, but I still didn't get it. What did they do to anger IBM? Do they have their own emulator that isn't Flex-ES? Thanks for any help in understanding this. Lindy -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Payne Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones > Virtually all commercial software licences contain language > covering this; typically the vendor agrees to indemnify the > licensee under certain conditions. Even IBM does. See Clause 1.7 on page 6 of the ICA agreement executed by no less that PSI and IBM at http://www.tech-news.com/imagesap/ibmpsiex1.pdf Interesting, in passing, that it took IBM six months to ratify the agreement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
