Tom Marchant wrote:
I wonder what happens if your SMFPRMxx used at IPL time excludes
type 19 records, then after everything is up you issue SETSMF
(or SET SMF) to include type 19 records.
Yeah, I know, it's kind of a kluge, but I wonder how the system
behaves.
The tricky part is you can't issue the command in COMMNDxx because those
commands are issued prior to SMF initialization. So you need some sort
of MPF/automation or other method to synchronize the command with other
things. That was a bit too much trouble for me to experiment with
considering I really don't care about the Type 19 records in the first
place. Still, I wonder if SMF might "hang" during the SET SMF command in
that scenario. You could just be delaying the inevitable ...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
