On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:09:06 -0600, Andreas F. Geissbuehler wrote: > > On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:49:53 +0200, R.S. wrote: > > >BTW: I know *existing* OS/390 application using more than 256 bytes in > >PARM. It is c89 compiler. I vaguely recollect, it creates "pseudo job" > >for compilation, this job looks like regular JCL, but all the compiler > >options are in PARM field (many LINES of PARM) and that's why it is > >circumvented in some way. I don't remember details, but the need is > obvious... > Not obvious, apparently, to IBM (nor to many contributors to this list (I am not among them), who would prefer to see the restriction remain). But a pat in the back for a good archive search.
> I was given a whole C library full of functios to recompile. the number of > parms on EXEC PGM=CCNDRVR exceed the PARM field length limit. Without > editting indvidual functions what's the best work-around? > o Invoke CCNDRVR from a Rexx EXEC. o Invoke c89 from "make". This seems like a natural for make. Take your pick. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
