Ted MacNEIL wrote:
But "The Company Line" is probably the last thing we
want to hear, whether it's right or wrong

I agree.
Especially when it doesn't match reality.

We are NOT paying less!
We are NOT exploiting JAVA/WebSphere on the mainframe.
We do NOT have any workloads that can exploit NAlc, as I understand the
announcements.
We are NOT going to z9 any day soon.

We are NOT the only customer in this situation!

Here, in Poland, majority of (small) datacenters run Adabas & Natural application. Very old applications, stable - no enhancements are done. They're trying to get rid of CICS in place of Com-plete, or AMshell (polish software). Everything to be qualified for z/OS.e license. What's always funny for me - on every IBM conference they hear about newest "bells & whistles" like Linux on mainframe, zAAP, zIIP (did I mention their applications are really OLD?), SOA, "on-demand". They hear it and think how to get service for 3725 or 3274, or how fix HDS 7700C aka Tetragon 2000. Oh, I forgot, they *don't pay less*, unless they migrate to dot-e system. Obviously IBM's addressed dot-e to new customers, but I know only old ones which decided to use it.

My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to