Thanks Tom, I mis-spoke. Dave ________________________________
From: Tom Marchant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 1/16/2007 8:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CATALOG ERROR On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:37:25 -0500, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote: > >Do you have noscratch specified in the GDG define? It should be >scratch to have the oldest gdg automatically roll off to allow the >next generation to be catalogued. > The oldest GDS will roll off regardless of SCRATCH. If neither SCRATCH nor EMPTY is specified, the oldest GDS will be in rolled-out status and will no longer be part of the GDG. In the pre-SMS days it would have been uncataloged but not scratched. That said, I agree with David that the GDG should be defined with SCRATCH. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
