In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/15/2007
at 08:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As an alternative, DS1LSTAR should suffice as such a flag. I would
>be delighted to see a design change such that any attempt to read
>beyond DS1LSTAR would result in EODAD's being invoked. Yes, this
>would break processes that write data sets with EXCP, fail to set
>DS1LSTAR, then read them with {B|Q}SAM. It's what they deserve.
It would break more than that, and no, the victims would not get what
they deserved.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
