In a recent note, Chris Mason said: > Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:51:08 +0100 > > [2] I'm well away from a topic I know much about here and I've not paid very > close attention to this thread but I believe I saw that an SMS-managed data > set did, in fact, deal with the problem, which, for some, might be > sufficient of a "fix and implement". > With that I well agree. I'm not very sympathetic to demands for retrofit; it only removes the incentive for forward migration. But there's no reason for SMS's limiting writing the EOF on a new extent to certain known DSORGs.
-- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
