On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 13:42 -0600, Rugen, Len wrote: > How much pain is there to setup a GRS ring? When I RTFM, everything > seems to talk about a XCF. I don't think I want or need XCF.
Depends on how your systems are configured. If you have multiple systems "all the same" it can be a pain. Especially if you haven't used &sysname (or similar) in dataset names. Can get *very* ugly when you start introducing systems that all have all their "system" datasets the same name, but on different volumes. Start with the default member in the books, and look for obvious candidates to add - but be ready for problems initially. Here's a vote for XCF - if you haven't done GRS setup before, it'll probably be *much* easier to get your head around XCF rather than GRS CTC. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
