On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:33:11 -0800, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This problem is not unsolvable. I am not asking how to solve it. I have >solved it. The points of my posts were > >1. Initially, could someone who is more up-to-date on channel programs than >I please decode the CCW gibberish for me?
That was done. >2. And then, why the heck can't DFSMS put out a message like "illegal >blocksize" rather than a message like >8000000000AC0004042084000000000000000000FF010F0000004EA00000AC00 FAILING >PARAMETER LIST DATA = 8680000400AC000000AC000000000000. You guys wonder why >the mainframe has fallen from favor and has a reputation for requiring the >labor of guys with 40 years of experience to parse its entrails? Look no >further than this message. Did you talk to the Support Center? No one here can answer your question authoritatively, but many have expressed the opinion that you should be getting S013 abend, not a unit check. Alan Altmark IBM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
