------------------------<snip>--------------------------
No. But I don't consider IBM "SYS1" data sets that are part of the OS
you are running "more than necessary". Just personal preference whether
you want dlibs cataloged or not. My personal preference is "yes" as long
as symbolics are used and updated as part of any dlib rollout - be it
maintenance or OS upgrade (I haven't cloned DLIBs with maintenance in
quiet a long time... one zone, one (set) dlib volume(s) ).
----------------------<unsnip>-----------------------
Mark, I always renamed my DLIB datasets to a different HLQ, just to keep
them in a different catalog. That way, I could maintain multiple
targets, each with its own master catalog, and not have to worry about
whether the DLIBs were catalog-accessable from that image.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
