On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 06:41:19 -0600, Roger Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:30:43 +0000, Roy Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> >>May I ask why you need to rename? >> >Roy, > Have a 1.4 system that is a totally separate/isolated environment that >doesn't share any dasd with the 1.7 systems I have on the same CEC. All >HCD work is done on the 1.7 system and a copy of the IODF is shipped >across to the 1.4 system. For some unknown reason, when the IODF V5 was >unloaded onto the 1.4 system, HCD on the 1.4 system indicates that it is >in V4 format. The hw activate was done on a 1.7 system and all the 1.7 >systems are happy, but when the 1.4 system was ipl'ed, it gave the IOS505A >message indicating the hw and sw tokens are out of synch. > >What I would like to do is rename the current 1.4 IODF which is in V4 >format and get another copy of the V5 Format IODF from the 1.7 system and >name it the same and re-ipl the 1.4 system. I am then hoping that the >IOS505A message will no longer be issued. > So the IODF on your 1.4 system is somehow not the correct one. Your plan is sound. Once you get the correct IODF to your 1.4 system, you could activate it and you'd find that it is back in sync. As has been mentioned, the IODF is not needed or used by the system except at IPL and ACTIVATE time. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
