> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Benik > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RMM to CA-1 or CA-1 to RMM > > > Well, it seems we have two directions we can go with our tape > management > system. We have some systems that run CA-1 and some that run > RMM. At > first we stated that we wanted to go to CA-1. This seems to > be what the > majority of people use. My personnel opinion I like CA-1 > much better, I > would like to get some opinions on what people think is the > best way to > go. I know, (because I've been there), most system programmers will > choose RMM...
Which is less expensive? That is the only question that would be asked around here. Factor in the cost of the software and the cost of converting. Personnel cost for on going maintenance is not important because it is "already paid for". -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
