From: Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Actually, it sounds like a problem which should be reported to IBM. It > is either a code error or a doc update.
I did open a PMR, and they told me that the inconsistent VTOCIX name was the cause of the problem. Later, when I post my considerations to the list and read your update, I started to think that the name inconsistency alone had nothing to do with it. Then I found this SER NO field, and decided to delete/build the VTOCIX from scratch, which worked. I can't prove it, but I think that if I'd have renamed the VTOCIX alone, i.e. with IEHPROGM, the problem would be still there. Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer Munich - Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
