In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/25/2007
at 02:29 AM, "Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>For a bit of background, our applications are all single CSECT load
>modules, with the only common exception being those running under
>CICS, that are linked with the CICS execution interface stub (which
>has so far shown to be upward/downward compatible for decades).
>It is therefore
?
>It is therefore easiest for us to supply updates in the form of
>replacement load modules, meaning we fix the source code, recompile
>and relink before packaging.
I don't see why it would be any easier than shipping object modules,
unless you are using facilities for which that is not supported. If
you must ship load modules, package them instream with ++ PROGRAM.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
