I don't know if I can ID the "mainframe" but I'm betting the CE for that site was a special brand of stupid if he let a tape drive sit bad for four [insert favourite expletive here] years.
I wonder why the BOFH was allowed to remain employed, though. Unless the company was required to hire the retarded... On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:09:44 -0500, Gary Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I came across this little ditty and chuckled a bit while racking my brain >trying to think of what type of "mainframe" the article refers to. > >I can't think of one, can you? > >http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5145?source=NLT_SHARK&nlid=6 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html >========================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
