I coded a module using Steve's example and got the same return code. So i changed DD to FI and DSN to DA and got a zero return code (and a successful dynamic allocation).
I guess I messed up the original parmlist I coded as well when I got Steve's result - DD and DSN work as well as FI and DA. Never mind. -Emily L On 3/13/07, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a recent note, Rich Tabor said: > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:34:15 -0700 > > I think you will have better luck using FI and DA instead of DD and DSN. > Why? -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
