No big deal unless the action contains a HOLD(AO) which would be the eyecatcher for us. Go ahead
Roland -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Eells Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Who uses IEE899I for Automation? Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the response)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
