In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/21/2007
at 04:22 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Wasn't there then. And the HASP designers never anticipated the
>needs of SDSF. But SDSF is now here and indispensable, so it must be
>able to impose new requirements for usability on JES2 and JES3.
First, why shouldn't the requirement be on SDSF? If JES2 can print the
data sets in the proper order then SDSF should be able to display them
in that order. Second, why should SDSF impose a requirement on JES3
when it doesn't support JES3? Third, what is the "proper" order for
spinoff data sets?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
