"Walt Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On 4/25/2007 3:52 PM, Paul Schuster wrote: > > Hello: Is there a way to prevent the SYSDSN ENQ from being removed when you > > dynamically de-allocate a data set? > > > > There is the parameter S99NORES to prevent the ENQ from being done when the > > data set is allocated, but no corresponding parameter on the de-allocation. > > Out of curiosity, why would you want to do that? What purpose does it
> serve to hold the ENQ when you no longer have the data set allocated? > > Walt > Paul, Just curious: are you by any chance looking for a solution for my GnnnnV99 problem??? Kees. ********************************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ********************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
