In a message dated 5/7/2007 9:51:08 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've never had a problem with CICS and velocity. We do about 3/4 of a million trans./day and get a couple of tenths to a half second response. I attended a Share WLM free for all about 3 - 4 years ago where CICS transaction goals vs. velocity goal management almost turned into a free >> Again, an educational opportunity. The WLM goals should match the business priorities and SLAs. How can you tell? In an MbM environment it's who squeals the loudest or who's your daddy? Cheryl has a method with their Goal Tender product (at _www.watsonwalker.com_ (http://www.watsonwalker.com) ) to take the WLM objectives and the SMF data and see what's shakin'. As previously posted the one thing certain is we're all a little different with varying workloads, capacity, Plexification, virtualization, enrollment, demand, cyclical adjustment, business fluctuations, etc.. As the environment becomes more complex, less and less people are trained from the technical side to present data to the hierarchy in a cogent manner to influence/impact decisions of more, better, bigger, or faster. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
