In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/15/2007
at 10:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As far as I know, this job will run without error even if the owner
>has ACCESS=NONE to SYS1.WHATEVER. But for nearly three hours other
>users will be unable to allocate SYS1.WHATEVER. There ought to be
>enforcement of a rule against this. And, in my view, that
>enforcement ought more properly to be done not by allocation nor by
>the initiator, but by GRS, the most proximate component.
That is not an informed view. GRS is the wrong component to make the
decision, even without taking performance into account. The only
reasonable place for the test is Allocation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
