In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/18/2007
at 04:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If all ENQs now performed with job scope were performed with job step
>scope, the "deadly embrace" would equally well be avoided.
But the data sets would no longer be protected against concurrent
updates.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
