On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:54:35 -0500, Alan Scott wrote: >On Tue, 22 May 2007 20:19:37 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Which doesn't work for zFS. Which brings back similar issues >>> that there were when HFS had to be SMS controlled. >> >>True. For zFS the usercat with symbolic aliasing is the >>alternative. (You can like it or despise it, but it's the >>alternative we have.) > >That sounds a little heavy handed for IBM. Seems to me that if we complain >enough it gets changed. We have not converted to zFS as yet for this very >reason. > Is this also the problem that IBM addressed by resolving system symbols embedded in symbolic links?
Other providers do likewise with symbols in the mount maps. IBM, however, often invents its own solutions in lieu of following the mode. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
