D'oh!  I never thought about his background being in UNIX...

Never mind...

I tried APL once, back in 77.  I thought it was the perfect programming 
language.  One could write an entire program on/in one line of code.  And, the 
part I liked best, no one could understand it and it "looked" like a computer 
programming language.

I've since grown up. <g>


 On Wed May 23 12:00 , 'McKown, John' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')">[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:48 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Non-Standard Mainframe Language?
>> 
>> 
>> Am I missing something here?
>> 
>> The below is an excerpt from a blog where the writer lamented 
>> that the ubiquitous  language "C" was available 
>> everywhere, for free, except for the mainframe.  And then 
>> rejoices that it finally came to the mainframe...
>> 
>> Okay, that part I get.  The part that interests me is since 
>> "C" was not available, 'mainframe users could have been in a 
>> position of having to write code in a "non-standard" 
>> language...'  A language like what...?  Cobol per chance...  
>> Maybe assembler?
>> 
>> As I started this, am I missing something here?
>> 
>> Inquiring minds want to know.
>> 
>
>Personal opinion time. In the environment which the author works
>(apparently UNIX), C is the defacto "standard language". We, as
>mainframers, could lament that there is no free COBOL on UNIX or
>Windows. We would have a strong argument that COBOL is the true standard
>language for COMMERCIAL programming. But the author, coming from his
>UNIX environment, assumes that z/OS should likewise consider C to be the
>defacto standard language. Now that z/OS has an integrated UNIX
>environment, he may have some good points. In order to use much of the
>freely available UNIX source code, a C compiler is totally required. But
>I think he is being parochial or chauvinistic to basically say "C is the
>standard language in my environment, so it should be the standard
>language in every other environment."
>
>Now, you want a non standard language? Try writing in APL2!
>
>--
>John McKown
>Senior Systems Programmer
>HealthMarkets
>Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
>Administrative Services Group
>Information Technology
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to